In response to Redbook’s recent article, “I Get Happy-Ending Massages and It Helps My Marriage,” ABMP Vice President Communication calls for an apology to the profession for linking therapeutic massage and prostitution.
July 7, 2014
Attn: Jill Herzig, Editor-in-Chief
300 W. 57th St.
New York, NY 10019
Dear Ms. Herzig:
No doubt you’re getting waves of response about your July 3 Redbook feature: “I Get Happy-Ending Massages and It Helps My Marriage,” as told to Anna Davies. How disappointing.
We represent a profession of more than 320,000 U.S-based massage therapists, more than 80,000 of whom are our members. They consider it offensive and dangerous when anyone—particularly the media—blends discussions about the massage therapy profession and the sex trade. Make no mistake, you’ve published a feature about a married woman who has retained a prostitute, not about a consumer of massage therapy.
Our members are specifically educated and dedicated to providing therapeutic massage services to their clients. About one-sixth of those are male professionals who admittedly already face gender-based challenges and must endeavor to break through barriers in this profession. You’ve succeeded in alienating them and building additional walls for them. You’ve also put up barriers for consumers who seek the many benefits of massage because you’ve questioned its safety. And you’ve endangered practitioners’ personal safety as ill-intended pseudo-clients seek to push the barriers of appropriate behavior in a bodywork session.
We look forward to an apology from Redbook to our members and to the massage therapy profession, and we’ll share that apology across all our social media outlets. Yours is an historic publication. We’d like to help you move forward with pride and accuracy, not sensationalism.
Leslie A. Young, Ph.D.
ABMP Vice President Communication
email@example.com or 303-679-7648/direct
Massage & Bodywork, Editor-in-Chief